Warming tips for cozy home heating
Guide

Rob is a seasoned home improvement writer with over 15 years of experience researching and recommending products for the home. Prior to starting Nurturing Homeaid, he wrote extensively for This Old House magazine and has been featured as a home expert on several TV and radio programs. An avid DIY-er,...

What To Know

  • In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the key differences and similarities between the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M and the SMSL SU-9, helping you make an informed decision about which DAC is the perfect match for your audio setup.
  • Both DACs offer excellent value for money, with the DacMagic 200M providing a slightly more refined and musical sound, while the SU-9 offers a wider range of connectivity options and a more neutral sound signature.
  • If you prefer a neutral and analytical sound, a wider range of connectivity options, and a more modern design, the SU-9 is a great value.

In the ever-evolving world of digital audio, the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M and the SMSL SU-9 stand as formidable contenders in the realm of DACs (Digital-to-Analog Converters). Both devices boast impressive specifications, advanced features, and a commitment to delivering pristine audio quality. In this comprehensive comparison, we will delve into the key differences and similarities between the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M and the SMSL SU-9, helping you make an informed decision about which DAC is the perfect match for your audio setup.

Design and Build Quality:

The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M exudes a classic and understated elegance with its brushed aluminum chassis and sleek lines. Its compact form factor makes it easy to integrate into any audio system. In contrast, the SMSL SU-9 boasts a more modern and angular design with a solid aluminum construction. Its larger footprint provides ample space for the device’s extensive connectivity options. Both DACs feature high-quality components and robust construction, ensuring durability and longevity.

Features and Connectivity:

The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M offers a wide range of digital inputs, including coaxial, optical, USB, and Bluetooth. It also features a high-quality headphone amplifier, making it a versatile choice for both home audio and personal listening. The SMSL SU-9 takes connectivity a step further with the addition of balanced XLR inputs and outputs, as well as a dedicated I2S input. It also supports a wider range of sampling rates, up to 32-bit/768kHz.

Audio Performance:

Both the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M and the SMSL SU-9 deliver exceptional audio performance, but with subtle differences in their sonic signatures. The DacMagic 200M is known for its warm and musical sound, with a rich and engaging midrange. The SMSL SU-9, on the other hand, offers a more neutral and analytical sound, with a wider soundstage and excellent detail retrieval.

DAC Architecture and Technology:

The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M employs a dual-mono design, with separate DAC chips for each channel. This design helps to reduce noise and distortion, resulting in a more accurate and dynamic sound. The SMSL SU-9 utilizes a single ESS Sabre DAC chip, which is renowned for its high performance and low noise levels.

Headphone Output:

The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M features a built-in headphone amplifier with a dedicated volume control. It provides a powerful and detailed sound for personal listening. The SMSL SU-9 does not have a built-in headphone amplifier, but its balanced XLR outputs can be used to drive a separate headphone amplifier for optimal performance.

Price and Value:

The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M is priced at around $500, while the SMSL SU-9 comes in at around $300. Both DACs offer excellent value for money, with the DacMagic 200M providing a slightly more refined and musical sound, while the SU-9 offers a wider range of connectivity options and a more neutral sound signature.

Wrap-Up:

The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M and the SMSL SU-9 are both outstanding DACs that offer exceptional audio performance and a wide range of features. Ultimately, the best choice for you depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you value a warm and musical sound, a built-in headphone amplifier, and a classic design, the DacMagic 200M is an excellent choice. If you prefer a neutral and analytical sound, a wider range of connectivity options, and a more modern design, the SU-9 is a great value.

Information You Need to Know

1. Which DAC has a better sound quality?

Both the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M and the SMSL SU-9 offer excellent sound quality, but they have slightly different sonic signatures. The DacMagic 200M is known for its warm and musical sound, while the SU-9 offers a more neutral and analytical sound.

2. Which DAC has more connectivity options?

The SMSL SU-9 has a wider range of connectivity options than the Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M. It includes balanced XLR inputs and outputs, as well as a dedicated I2S input.

3. Which DAC is better for personal listening?

The Cambridge Audio DacMagic 200M has a built-in headphone amplifier, making it a great choice for personal listening. The SMSL SU-9 does not have a built-in headphone amplifier, but its balanced XLR outputs can be used to drive a separate headphone amplifier for optimal performance.

Was this page helpful?

Rob Sanders

Rob is a seasoned home improvement writer with over 15 years of experience researching and recommending products for the home. Prior to starting Nurturing Homeaid, he wrote extensively for This Old House magazine and has been featured as a home expert on several TV and radio programs. An avid DIY-er, Rob takes pride in testing out the latest tools and gadgets to see how they can make home projects easier. When it comes to heating systems, he's evaluated over 50 different furnace and boiler models over the years. Rob founded Nurturing Homeaid with his business partner Jim in 2020 to provide homeowners with genuine product recommendations they can trust. In his free time, Rob enjoys remodeling old homes with his family and traveling to visit architectural landmarks across the country. He holds a bachelor's degree in Journalism from Syracuse University.
Back to top button